Skip to main content

Jonah 1:7-10 What is this that you have done? Day 326

Good morning saints in the Lord,

We find ourselves visiting Jonah on the ship bound for Tarshish in the midst of the storm.  Any time a bunch of pagan sailors ask "What is this that you have done?", it is not a good sign. Having been in the Navy, I can attest that while not all sailors are great sinners, the reputation is not far from truth. So when these sailors recognize that Jonah is the cause of their problems, they know he has done something really bad.  But thanks be to God that he uses even this for good.

Blessings,

Jeff

All part of the plan.  Even though Jonah goes outside of God's revealed will (Go to Nineveh), God's sovereign will is not frustrated.  In fact, if Jonah had not run away, he would not have wound up in the belly of the great fish for three days and nights.  If he had not wound up there, Jesus would not have had "the sign of Jonah" as a sign of death, burial and resurrection.  God's plan of salvation included using the disobedience of his prophet Jonah to provide a picture of the fulfilment of Genesis 3:15.  Jesus is the one who crushes the serpent's head in death, burial and resurrection.  

Yet, this in no way condones disobedience of revealed will.  One of the ways God delivers us from evil so that we may not be tempted is revealed will in Scripture.  While we cannot be justified by the law, it still has a function of restraining the passions and desires of the flesh.

From https://journal.rts.edu/article/martin-luthers-doctrine-of-temptation/ A commentary on Luther's doctrine of temptation.

The spirit of our time is such that one might suppose Luther is against the moral law as a rule of life for the believer. This would be an utter mistake. What we noted above about the need for conscience to be awakened shows this. Luther’s comments on the law in the Galatians Commentary indicate the same:

We have said before that the law in a Christian ought not to pass its bounds, but ought to have dominion only over the flesh, which is in subjection to it, and remaineth under it. But if it should presume to creep into the conscience, and there seek to reign, see thou play the cunning logician and make the true division. Say thou: “O law, thou wouldest climb up into the kingdom of my conscience and there reprove it of sin, and take from me the joy of my heart, which I have by faith in Christ, and drive me to desperation that I may be without hope and utterly perish. Keep within thy bounds, and exercise thy power upon the flesh,” for I am baptized and by the gospel am called to the partaking of righteousness and everlasting life.[39]


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Leviticus 18:21 - Partial restoration of creation order

Dear Friends, Some times we forget that Moses wrote Genesis.  Obviously, he did not have first hand knowledge of the events of creation.  But God did and revealed them to Moses.  The "story arc" is clear to Moses despite the millenia of history between Genesis and Leviticus.  The plan for ultimate restoration is hazy, but God is at work repairing some of the damage. Blessings, Jeff What is the prohibition on child sacrifice doing in the list of prohibited sexual relations? Be fruitful and multiply - First commandment in Genesis.  God made the world to be inhabited.   Having children is how this  was to happen.  So child sacrifice was a direct violation of this first command to Adam and Eve. Marriage is one man and one woman is the creation order. Seems simple enough.  I can imagine men thinking, Yeah but God didn't say which woman.  I will do the one woman thing if she is my sister, or aunt or …..  So God gives all these examples of unlawful unions.  To this day, man stil

1 Chronicles 24:1-6 How about those Levites! Day 332

Good morning friends, Good foundations are important.  Our author turns to the religious life of the returning exiles. Blessings, Jeff We have seen the emphasis on the Davidic line in the  political life of Israel.  The other area of emphasis is the Aaronic priesthood and Levitical workers. In this passage we have a quick review of the somewhat sanitized picture of the start of Aaron's line.  The returning exiles would have known that Nadab and Abihu did not just "die before their father without children".  They rebelled against God by offering unauthorized fire and were themselves consumed by fire from the Lord. Leviticus 10.  The case of Abiathar  son of Ahitub son of Ahimelech, who was faithful to David, but later rebelled with Adonijah is also not mentioned. But the passage points to the importance of the Aaronic line to the rebuilding of the temple by the exiles.  The history of the northern kingdom which was without the Levites from the beginning could not be repeat

Matthew 22:23 - the danger of not knowing Scripture - Day 193

Yesterday's passage was not very theological.  Today's is very theological.  I have only scratched the surface, but hope this encourages us to question ourselves about "knowledge of Scripture and the power of God". Blessings  Jeff This is a fascinating dialogue between Sadducees and Jesus.  So let's interrogate the passage. What distinguishes the Sadducees from other Jewish doctrinal positions?  They deny that there is a resurrection.  They are absolutely committed to this doctrine. How does their commitment shape their thought and questions? Even though they don't believe in the resurrection, they formulate a question focused on showing the absurdity of the resurrection.  They are not pointing to a passage of scripture that supports them, but asking a hypothetical question to make resurrection look silly. What is the purpose of the "Levirate marriage"? Deuteronomy 5:5-8.  First this is not a violation of the 7th commandment (adultery).  Brothers wer