Skip to main content

Hosea 9:4 Past, present of future - Day 307

When I picked this verse back on the 4th of July '21, I really didn't have any particular reason other than I had written thoughts on most of the rest of the chapter in previous year's readings.  So this was just something that I hadn't written on before.  But now that I have written it (July 18 "21), the applicability to "Independence Day" seems to be clearer.  Israel was well on their road to ruin.  But they still had kings and some degree of freedom.  Hosea may well have been speaking of current loss of benefit and not future.

Blessings,

Jeff

Part of the description of the Lord's punishment of Israel.

Hosea was a prophet to Israel at the time of Jeroboam II, the 3rd son of Jehu as we saw in yesterday's devotional. 

In reality, the northern kingdom had abandoned proper sacrifices from the beginning.  Because Jeroboam I was afraid that Israel would want to go back to Jerusalem to comply with laws, he made two calves to replace temple worship. All the kings of Israel fit this description: He did not depart from the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, which he made Israel to sin. 2 Kings 15:9

Calvin sees this not as punishment in the future when they are dispersed, but as current punishment.  

What, then, is the meaning of the Prophet, when he says, "All that eat of their sacrifices shall be polluted"? We must know that the Prophet speaks here of the intermediate time, as though he said, "What the Israelites now sacrifice is without any advantage, and God is not pacified with these trifles for they bring polluted hands, they change not their minds, they obtrude their sacrifices on God, but they themselves first pollute them." Of this same doctrine we have already often treated; I shall not then dwell on it now; but it is enough to point out the design of the Prophet, which was to show that the Israelites were seeking in vain to pacify God by their ceremonies, for they were vain expiations which God did not regard, but deemed as worthless. Hosea 9:4

To me, this is another way in which the prophetic voice is sometimes hard to understand.  Or maybe it is just the words supplied by interpreters.  They used a future tense to be consistent with v3.  But it is significant that prophet can be addressing a current loss of blessing, not always a future loss.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Revelation 22:3-5 Final and eternal restoration - Day 365

Dear saints in the Lord, Congratulations!  You made it.  We have been through much turmoil in the last year ('20-'21).  But God is faithful to His promises.  I trust that you have been blessed in your reading and have drawn closer to God.   Since we didn't get the blog up and running at the beginning of the challenge, I am going to go back and post entries to cover that first month or so.   Blessings, Jeff Nothing accursed in the city of God, the new Jerusalem.  The presence of sin will be gone.  I am working on memorizing Westminster Shorter Catechism and currently on question 82.  Is any man able perfectly to keep the commandments of God? No mere man since the fall is able in this life perfectly to keep the commandments of God but does daily break them in thought, word and deed. I think our passage today points to the truth of this question.  Do you notice how this answer is not exactly the same as the question. "Any man" bec...

Malachi 2:10-12 Here we go again!! Day 363

Good afternoon friends, As we draw to the end of the Old Testament, we see that Judah has rebuilt the temple and the walls of Jerusalem, but they are following in the footsteps of faithless fathers and not in the footsteps of Abraham and ultimately God.  The exile was a low point, but now a new low is about to happen.  The prophetic voice has once again become warning and not encouraging. Faithful reading and preaching of the word is all that keeps us from losing our way.  May we be faithful in our generation. Blessings, Jeff I am sure I have mentioned this before, but it bears repeating.  The section summary, chapter and verse are not in the original language.  They are all rather modern inventions to help us.  For example, the section title here is "Judah profaned the Covenant".  That is OK as far as it goes, but which Covenant?  So let's take a look. Observations Starts with 3 questions but who is asking the questions and to whom are they addre...

2 Chronicles 35:23-26 Lament for the last good king - Day 364

Good morning fellow exiles and pilgrims, One more day of devotions.  We are indeed exiles and pilgrims in this world as we look not to the things that are seen but to the things that are unseen.  The 20th anniversary of 9/11 attacks can serve as a reminder that this world is not our home. Blessings, Jeff The lamentations for Josiah written by Jeremiah.  However, the book of Lamentations does not include any reference to Josiah as they are focused on the fall of Jerusalem.  While these lost lamentations were "made the rule" there are only 4 more kings and none of them were good like Josiah and none died in Jerusalem.  The phrase "to this day" generally refers to the time of the author (post exile).  Taken together, it may be that these laments were for the last good king and during the exile the people were longing for the next good king. Zerubbabel in a way was the next good king as temple and Jerusalem were rebuilt. But Jesus truly was the next king and He...