Skip to main content

Hosea 14:8 - God's probing question - Day 312

Good morning sisters and brothers,

We say goodbye to Hosea for another year.  While he is a "minor" prophet, there is nothing "minor" in what he says.  The last prophet to the northern kingdom before dispersion.  Yet God is still calling them to return to Him.  May we hear this call as well.

Blessings,

Jeff

Here is another example of God asking a rhetorical question.  This time it is to Ephraim, the tribe that represents the northern kingdom.  Remember that Joseph was Jacob's favorite son and Joseph is replaced by his sons Ephraim and Manasseh who were born to him while he was in Egypt.  So Joseph has a double portion with the nation of Israel.  By the way, Ephraim means "doubly fruitful." 

I don't recall ever commenting on the "federal" or representative theme in God's relationship with man.  Adam represents all mankind in the garden.  What Adam does, all subsequent man have also done.  This is Paul's argument in Romans.  We are all "in Adam" until God regenerates us.  Then we are "in Christ".  We were dead in Adam, we are alive in Christ.  The guilt of Adam is imputed to us until God saves us.  Then, the righteousness of Christ is imputed to us.

In this passage one tribe represents the whole northern kingdom that rebelled against house of David.

The thread of the second commandment (no carved image or any likeness) reappears.  In essence, God is asking Israel to remember this commandment.  What does God have to do with idols? Absolutely nothing.  Israel cannot use images in worshipping God.  To do so makes us think that God is like a creature. To do so denies that God is the Creator.

I look after you and answer you. I am the living source of your fruit.  Notice the play on words.  Ephraim is "double fruit" but God is the source of his fruit.  The idols you worship cannot and do not look after you or answer you.  They are not alive and not the source of fruit.

When I read God's questions, I am convicted by His Spirit.  He makes me look at my life and see if there is a similar unconfessed sin in me.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Leviticus 18:21 - Partial restoration of creation order

Dear Friends, Some times we forget that Moses wrote Genesis.  Obviously, he did not have first hand knowledge of the events of creation.  But God did and revealed them to Moses.  The "story arc" is clear to Moses despite the millenia of history between Genesis and Leviticus.  The plan for ultimate restoration is hazy, but God is at work repairing some of the damage. Blessings, Jeff What is the prohibition on child sacrifice doing in the list of prohibited sexual relations? Be fruitful and multiply - First commandment in Genesis.  God made the world to be inhabited.   Having children is how this  was to happen.  So child sacrifice was a direct violation of this first command to Adam and Eve. Marriage is one man and one woman is the creation order. Seems simple enough.  I can imagine men thinking, Yeah but God didn't say which woman.  I will do the one woman thing if she is my sister, or aunt or …..  So God gives all these examples of unlawful unions.  To this day, man stil

1 Chronicles 24:1-6 How about those Levites! Day 332

Good morning friends, Good foundations are important.  Our author turns to the religious life of the returning exiles. Blessings, Jeff We have seen the emphasis on the Davidic line in the  political life of Israel.  The other area of emphasis is the Aaronic priesthood and Levitical workers. In this passage we have a quick review of the somewhat sanitized picture of the start of Aaron's line.  The returning exiles would have known that Nadab and Abihu did not just "die before their father without children".  They rebelled against God by offering unauthorized fire and were themselves consumed by fire from the Lord. Leviticus 10.  The case of Abiathar  son of Ahitub son of Ahimelech, who was faithful to David, but later rebelled with Adonijah is also not mentioned. But the passage points to the importance of the Aaronic line to the rebuilding of the temple by the exiles.  The history of the northern kingdom which was without the Levites from the beginning could not be repeat

Matthew 22:23 - the danger of not knowing Scripture - Day 193

Yesterday's passage was not very theological.  Today's is very theological.  I have only scratched the surface, but hope this encourages us to question ourselves about "knowledge of Scripture and the power of God". Blessings  Jeff This is a fascinating dialogue between Sadducees and Jesus.  So let's interrogate the passage. What distinguishes the Sadducees from other Jewish doctrinal positions?  They deny that there is a resurrection.  They are absolutely committed to this doctrine. How does their commitment shape their thought and questions? Even though they don't believe in the resurrection, they formulate a question focused on showing the absurdity of the resurrection.  They are not pointing to a passage of scripture that supports them, but asking a hypothetical question to make resurrection look silly. What is the purpose of the "Levirate marriage"? Deuteronomy 5:5-8.  First this is not a violation of the 7th commandment (adultery).  Brothers wer