Skip to main content

Judges 18:1-2 - Danites running amok - Day 216

Dear Friends,

Today's devotion is about excuses.  When I was working at Millsone, there was an "accountability" phase of leadership.  Everybody had to be able to explain why they did what they did.  Generally, this was after something went wrong.  It is very hard to explain why you didn't follow a procedure.  We should take Paul's warning to the Corinthians that we all have to stand before the judgment seat of Christ.  Will our "excuses" hold up before His questioning?

Blessings

Jeff

Joshua 19:40-47 describes the lot that fell to Dan, how it was "lost to them" and their eventual capture of Leshem.

40 The seventh lot came out for the tribe of the people of Dan, according to their clans. 41 And the territory of its inheritance included Zorah, Eshtaol, Ir-shemesh, 42 Shaalabbin, Aijalon, Ithlah, 43 Elon, Timnah, Ekron, 44 Eltekeh, Gibbethon, Baalath, 45 Jehud, Bene-berak, Gath-rimmon, 46 and Me-jarkon and Rakkon with the territory over against Joppa. 47 When the territory of the people of Dan was lost to them, the people of Dan went up and fought against Leshem, and after capturing it and striking it with the sword they took possession of it and settled in it, calling Leshem, Dan, after the name of Dan their ancestor.

This passage in Judges explains how this happened.  The Levite in the house of Micah is a commentary on the mixed up religious practices in Israel during this time.  We have seen numerous "going after foreign gods" episodes.  This is different in that the value of a Levite is recognized but used for idolatrous purposes.  The mixture of Jewish and pagan practices.  

The fact that there was no king is the implied reason for apostacy.  This is one of those "is it true?" things.  We believe that every word in scripture is God breathed and therefore inerrant.  But it seems like we can ask if having a king (political arena) would have solved this problem (religious arena).  This entire episode is an example of how individual tribes were going astray.  Instead of conquering the land that they were allotted, they go off to the edges of Canaan.  Partial obedience is not really obedience. 

The Levitical priesthood was really responsible for maintaining observation of the law.  They were the spiritual authorities.  While Moses and Joshua were political/military leaders, the Levites retained responsibility for spiritual practices.  

As Calvin later stated, man's heart is a factory for idols.  We can fault the Danites, but we have to take this warning very seriously.  We must watch ourselves very carefully and be open to correction by our overseers.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2 Chronicles 33:7-9 Thoughts on Davidic covenant - Day 362

Good morning faithful readers, The finish line is in sight!!!  One of the themes of scripture is that God is a covenant keeping God.  There are many between God and man. Adam, Noah, David are examples.  Covenants are more than promises.  They are made between a superior and inferior with conditions for each side and blessing and penalties based on keeping the conditions.  These are covenants of works which fallen man was unable to keep.  Thanks be to God that the Father made a covenant of grace with Christ, the second Adam, which he fully kept. Blessings, Jeff The promise in v8 was made to David when he had planned to build the temple and God promised to build him a house forever. (2 Sam 7:10).  Seems like there are only two possibilities about Manasseh's disobedience.  Either he knew of this covenant that God had made with his 13th great grandfather and chose to disregard it, or he didn't know of it and was unaware of the penalty.  Let's con...

2 Chronicles 30:16-20 Hearts set to seek the Lord - Day 359

Good morning fellow members of the household of God, After writing the devotional, I am thinking about the Passover as a household event.  In ancient Israel, the physical household of man was covered by the blood of the lamb.  Now, it is the spiritual household of God that is covered by the blood of the Lamb. Blessings, Jeff The account of the greatest celebration of Passover since time of Solomon (v 26).   Observations: One of the things that made this one great is participation of some of the tribes from the northern kingdom.  Israel was a united kingdom and Solomon and now toward the end of the northern kingdom, there is at least a semblance of being united. God allows some exemptions: Who offers the sacrifice:  The original Passover was a family by family sacrifice of a lamb.  However in  Deuteronomy 16:5-6 this changed to a centralized location once they entered the promised land.  (You may not offer the Passover sacrifice within any of ...

2 Chronicles 35:23-26 Lament for the last good king - Day 364

Good morning fellow exiles and pilgrims, One more day of devotions.  We are indeed exiles and pilgrims in this world as we look not to the things that are seen but to the things that are unseen.  The 20th anniversary of 9/11 attacks can serve as a reminder that this world is not our home. Blessings, Jeff The lamentations for Josiah written by Jeremiah.  However, the book of Lamentations does not include any reference to Josiah as they are focused on the fall of Jerusalem.  While these lost lamentations were "made the rule" there are only 4 more kings and none of them were good like Josiah and none died in Jerusalem.  The phrase "to this day" generally refers to the time of the author (post exile).  Taken together, it may be that these laments were for the last good king and during the exile the people were longing for the next good king. Zerubbabel in a way was the next good king as temple and Jerusalem were rebuilt. But Jesus truly was the next king and He...