Skip to main content

Matthew 22:23 - the danger of not knowing Scripture - Day 193

Yesterday's passage was not very theological.  Today's is very theological.  I have only scratched the surface, but hope this encourages us to question ourselves about "knowledge of Scripture and the power of God".

Blessings 

Jeff

This is a fascinating dialogue between Sadducees and Jesus.  So let's interrogate the passage.

What distinguishes the Sadducees from other Jewish doctrinal positions?  They deny that there is a resurrection.  They are absolutely committed to this doctrine.

How does their commitment shape their thought and questions? Even though they don't believe in the resurrection, they formulate a question focused on showing the absurdity of the resurrection.  They are not pointing to a passage of scripture that supports them, but asking a hypothetical question to make resurrection look silly.

What is the purpose of the "Levirate marriage"? Deuteronomy 5:5-8.  First this is not a violation of the 7th commandment (adultery).  Brothers were prohibited from sexual relations with sister-in-law while the brother was alive.  But this special rule was given to raise up an heir if a brother died.  This is a real challenge if the first born son dies with no heir.  The second born would stand to inherit, but he is required to marry the widow.  The focus is on physical life

What is the error that Jesus charges them with?  Not knowing Scripture nor power of God.  They are trying to use a special rule about heirs in this life to the future life after the resurrection.  So they "knew" about the special case but did not apply it appropriately.

Why might the Sadducees come to their conclusion?  The resurrection isn't explicitly taught in the OT.  There are hints but a future life and a resurrection are not really the same thing.  For example, David was sure he would see his dead infant son.  And Job knew he would see God in his flesh.  But bodily resurrection might not be required. 

What should we learn from this?

Debate about doctrine must be based on Scripture, not hypotheticals. 

The author gets to say what the book means.  Sadducees are readers, not authors.  Of course they also denied that Jesus was God.  So they didn't recognize His authority.  But we do recognize Jesus as author.  What He says about the Word and its teaching is true.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Leviticus 18:21 - Partial restoration of creation order

Dear Friends, Some times we forget that Moses wrote Genesis.  Obviously, he did not have first hand knowledge of the events of creation.  But God did and revealed them to Moses.  The "story arc" is clear to Moses despite the millenia of history between Genesis and Leviticus.  The plan for ultimate restoration is hazy, but God is at work repairing some of the damage. Blessings, Jeff What is the prohibition on child sacrifice doing in the list of prohibited sexual relations? Be fruitful and multiply - First commandment in Genesis.  God made the world to be inhabited.   Having children is how this  was to happen.  So child sacrifice was a direct violation of this first command to Adam and Eve. Marriage is one man and one woman is the creation order. Seems simple enough.  I can imagine men thinking, Yeah but God didn't say which woman.  I will do the one woman thing if she is my sister, or aunt or …..  So God gives all these examples of unlawful unions.  To this day, man stil
Post a Comment
Read more

1 Chronicles 24:1-6 How about those Levites! Day 332

Good morning friends, Good foundations are important.  Our author turns to the religious life of the returning exiles. Blessings, Jeff We have seen the emphasis on the Davidic line in the  political life of Israel.  The other area of emphasis is the Aaronic priesthood and Levitical workers. In this passage we have a quick review of the somewhat sanitized picture of the start of Aaron's line.  The returning exiles would have known that Nadab and Abihu did not just "die before their father without children".  They rebelled against God by offering unauthorized fire and were themselves consumed by fire from the Lord. Leviticus 10.  The case of Abiathar  son of Ahitub son of Ahimelech, who was faithful to David, but later rebelled with Adonijah is also not mentioned. But the passage points to the importance of the Aaronic line to the rebuilding of the temple by the exiles.  The history of the northern kingdom which was without the Levites from the beginning could not be repeat
Post a Comment
Read more