Skip to main content

Psalm 69:19 Dealing with reproach, shame and dishonor - Day 137

Good afternoon fellow saints,

As we come to the end of a week of more history making events,(originally written in Jan '21)  this seems to be an appropriate portion of this Psalm.  I am remined again that actions have consequences.  Sometimes we don't know what the consequences will be, sometimes the consequences seem to be disproportionate to the action.  But there are always consequences.  The Westminster Confession of Faith calls this "contingency of secondary causes".  Our free choices are what God uses to bring about whatsoever comes to pass.

As Christians, we need to think about the likely consequences of our actions.  If they could reasonably bring reproach, shame and dishonor on the name of Christ, we must reconsider those actions.

Blessings,

Jeff

David's cry for help. My reproach, shame and dishonor. No one shows pity.  He meets only with cruelty (poison for food and sour wine to drink).  I am puzzled by how the greatest king of Israel could find himself in this condition.  Fleeing from Absalom comes to mind.  Perhaps when he commands a census.  While he was a great king, he was not a perfect king.  There were times when he had done things that deserved reproach, shame and dishonor.  But why would people refuse to show pity?  When a good man has a moral lapse, others are generally willing to be lenient in light of the good he has done,  However, David's opponents have never liked him and want him punished without mercy.  David is looking to God for pity because he is not getting it from men.

Then I have to think about how this applies to Jesus.  If He had not been given sour wine as He hung on the cross, would the link to this psalm would be a challenge?  After all, I say that Jesus had no sin.  He did nothing deserving of reproach, shame or dishonor.  But God made him to be sin who knew no sin. (2 Cor 5),   David was suffering for his own actions.  Jesus is suffering for mine.  

I must never agree with the sentiment that everybody deep down loves Jesus.  As some hated David, every unbeliever hates Jesus because He was holy.  

While people showed Jesus no pity, neither did the Father. David had hope that God would deliver him.  Jesus knew that all the wrath of God had to be poured out on Him in order to save anyone.  

Tim Keller points to this as an "unanswered prayer".  David hoped for pity from men and did not receive it.  Jesus was asking for deliverance from the Father and did not receive it.  We pray for what we desire, but always in the context of Your will be done.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Leviticus 18:21 - Partial restoration of creation order

Dear Friends, Some times we forget that Moses wrote Genesis.  Obviously, he did not have first hand knowledge of the events of creation.  But God did and revealed them to Moses.  The "story arc" is clear to Moses despite the millenia of history between Genesis and Leviticus.  The plan for ultimate restoration is hazy, but God is at work repairing some of the damage. Blessings, Jeff What is the prohibition on child sacrifice doing in the list of prohibited sexual relations? Be fruitful and multiply - First commandment in Genesis.  God made the world to be inhabited.   Having children is how this  was to happen.  So child sacrifice was a direct violation of this first command to Adam and Eve. Marriage is one man and one woman is the creation order. Seems simple enough.  I can imagine men thinking, Yeah but God didn't say which woman.  I will do the one woman thing if she is my sister, or aunt or …..  So God gives all these examples of unlawful unions.  To this day, man stil
Post a Comment
Read more

1 Chronicles 24:1-6 How about those Levites! Day 332

Good morning friends, Good foundations are important.  Our author turns to the religious life of the returning exiles. Blessings, Jeff We have seen the emphasis on the Davidic line in the  political life of Israel.  The other area of emphasis is the Aaronic priesthood and Levitical workers. In this passage we have a quick review of the somewhat sanitized picture of the start of Aaron's line.  The returning exiles would have known that Nadab and Abihu did not just "die before their father without children".  They rebelled against God by offering unauthorized fire and were themselves consumed by fire from the Lord. Leviticus 10.  The case of Abiathar  son of Ahitub son of Ahimelech, who was faithful to David, but later rebelled with Adonijah is also not mentioned. But the passage points to the importance of the Aaronic line to the rebuilding of the temple by the exiles.  The history of the northern kingdom which was without the Levites from the beginning could not be repeat
Post a Comment
Read more

Matthew 22:23 - the danger of not knowing Scripture - Day 193

Yesterday's passage was not very theological.  Today's is very theological.  I have only scratched the surface, but hope this encourages us to question ourselves about "knowledge of Scripture and the power of God". Blessings  Jeff This is a fascinating dialogue between Sadducees and Jesus.  So let's interrogate the passage. What distinguishes the Sadducees from other Jewish doctrinal positions?  They deny that there is a resurrection.  They are absolutely committed to this doctrine. How does their commitment shape their thought and questions? Even though they don't believe in the resurrection, they formulate a question focused on showing the absurdity of the resurrection.  They are not pointing to a passage of scripture that supports them, but asking a hypothetical question to make resurrection look silly. What is the purpose of the "Levirate marriage"? Deuteronomy 5:5-8.  First this is not a violation of the 7th commandment (adultery).  Brothers wer
Post a Comment
Read more