Skip to main content

Isaiah 3:13 Stepping into prophetic books Day 126

Dear Friends,

Welcome to the prophetic!!!  You may have heard people say that they interpret the Bible literally.  But what does that mean?   That God has eyes, ears, hands, arms, etc?  That a word used in a prophetic book  and in a historical book mean the same thing?  My opinion is that the literal interpretation is the various styles use words differently.  For example, a day in history is generally 24 hours.  A day in prophecy is generally not 24 hours.  So as we go through Isaiah to Malachi (17 books), let us be gracious and not dogmatic.  I am stating what I think it means and how it might apply.  Conversation is welcome on differing views.

Blessings,

Jeff

One of the problems with the way the OT is organized is that the prophets are divided by length.  Major prophets are long and come first, minor prophets are short and come last..  So when we start with Isaiah, we can get the impression that he was the first prophet.

Just as the Wisdom books have a particular style, so too with prophetic.  Remember the accusation - response in Job.  No one really had the insight as to what had happened in heaven.  Just because one of the friends said something that is recorded in scripture doesn't make it something on which we should base doctrine.  But in prophetic, what is going on in heaven is revealed and the prophet is putting it into human terms.  This passage is an example.  Does the LORD physically confront the elders and princes of the people?  Or is Isaiah giving the people a picture that the can relate to?  God has specific complaints against His people and a courtroom setting makes sense to the audience.

Getting prophetic "right" is hard.  Social justice is a hot topic these days.  It was also an issue in Isaiah's day.  But we must make sure we are using the terms in the same way God does when we interact with culture that uses the terms in a different way.  Here God is concerned about oppression of the poor within Judah, the last fragment of His chosen people.  Making it into secular national government policy or an economic system is not the same thing.  We need to understand that God is concerned about the poor and the church needs to model biblical justice.  But biblical justice is not a secular government policy.  The church's mission is the gospel.  Justice is a result.  If we make justice our mission, the gospel is lost.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Leviticus 18:21 - Partial restoration of creation order

Dear Friends, Some times we forget that Moses wrote Genesis.  Obviously, he did not have first hand knowledge of the events of creation.  But God did and revealed them to Moses.  The "story arc" is clear to Moses despite the millenia of history between Genesis and Leviticus.  The plan for ultimate restoration is hazy, but God is at work repairing some of the damage. Blessings, Jeff What is the prohibition on child sacrifice doing in the list of prohibited sexual relations? Be fruitful and multiply - First commandment in Genesis.  God made the world to be inhabited.   Having children is how this  was to happen.  So child sacrifice was a direct violation of this first command to Adam and Eve. Marriage is one man and one woman is the creation order. Seems simple enough.  I can imagine men thinking, Yeah but God didn't say which woman.  I will do the one woman thing if she is my sister, or aunt or …..  So God gives all these examples of unlawful unions.  To this day, man stil
Post a Comment
Read more

1 Chronicles 24:1-6 How about those Levites! Day 332

Good morning friends, Good foundations are important.  Our author turns to the religious life of the returning exiles. Blessings, Jeff We have seen the emphasis on the Davidic line in the  political life of Israel.  The other area of emphasis is the Aaronic priesthood and Levitical workers. In this passage we have a quick review of the somewhat sanitized picture of the start of Aaron's line.  The returning exiles would have known that Nadab and Abihu did not just "die before their father without children".  They rebelled against God by offering unauthorized fire and were themselves consumed by fire from the Lord. Leviticus 10.  The case of Abiathar  son of Ahitub son of Ahimelech, who was faithful to David, but later rebelled with Adonijah is also not mentioned. But the passage points to the importance of the Aaronic line to the rebuilding of the temple by the exiles.  The history of the northern kingdom which was without the Levites from the beginning could not be repeat
Post a Comment
Read more

Matthew 22:23 - the danger of not knowing Scripture - Day 193

Yesterday's passage was not very theological.  Today's is very theological.  I have only scratched the surface, but hope this encourages us to question ourselves about "knowledge of Scripture and the power of God". Blessings  Jeff This is a fascinating dialogue between Sadducees and Jesus.  So let's interrogate the passage. What distinguishes the Sadducees from other Jewish doctrinal positions?  They deny that there is a resurrection.  They are absolutely committed to this doctrine. How does their commitment shape their thought and questions? Even though they don't believe in the resurrection, they formulate a question focused on showing the absurdity of the resurrection.  They are not pointing to a passage of scripture that supports them, but asking a hypothetical question to make resurrection look silly. What is the purpose of the "Levirate marriage"? Deuteronomy 5:5-8.  First this is not a violation of the 7th commandment (adultery).  Brothers wer
Post a Comment
Read more