Skip to main content

Isaiah 28:1 - Who wants to join the "Church of the drunkards of Ephraim"? Day 147

Dear friends,

One of the marks of the prophetic voice in Scripture is that it rarely has good news.  The prophets after Judah's return from Babylon gave encouragement to re-build the temple.  But there was a lot of warning as well.  All the prophets leading up to fall of Israel and then Judah are "wake up before its too late."  So as we make our way through Isaiah, we must face this reality.  Part of the answer to the Westminster Shorter Catechism question on what "before me" in the First Commandment teaches us is "God, who sees all things, takes notice of and is much displeased with the sin of having any other god."  Why would I do any thing with which God is much displeased?

Blessings,

Jeff

The drunkards of Ephraim. Fading flower of its glorious beauty.  What a pleasant description for a tribe of Israel.  And not once but twice.  The exact opposite of what Israel was supposed to be.  Referring to the northern kingdom that followed Jeroboam after Solomon's death. These 10 tribes become idolatrous, a long series of bad kings rule over them.  They go from bad to worse.  

The first ripe fig.  Expression is lost on us mainly because we are not really big fig eaters.  Study bible notes say "June figs were delightful because they foreshadowed the September harvest (Hos 9:10; Mic 7:1; Na 3:12). Ephraim with all her possibilities of achievement would be exiled, and the fruit of her labors would be enjoyed by the Assyrians. Isaiah 28:4"  If we think back to Promised Land as "flowing with milk and honey" despite that fact the wicked Canaanites lived there.  The land was productive even though the people who lived there were evil.  Now the same thing is to happen to Israel,  The Assyrians were going to have this land.  

This makes me wonder why the northern kingdom did not repent?  Basically they were unable and unwilling.  

Unable - breaking covenant, not keeping commandments, statutes and rules became habitual.  They were dead spiritually and unable to respond to God.

Unwilling - They were convinced that they were free to do as they pleased in worship because they were God's chosen people.  They divorced themselves from the direction for Levitical priesthood and temple worship.  Convinced that they had found a better way.

Modern "liberal Christianity"  is in the same condition. Divorced from scripture as source of truth and ethics, unable and unwilling to return to orthodox faith as defined in Scripture even though they still want to be called Christian.

It is all very sad. Yet God is righteous in his judgment.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Leviticus 18:21 - Partial restoration of creation order

Dear Friends, Some times we forget that Moses wrote Genesis.  Obviously, he did not have first hand knowledge of the events of creation.  But God did and revealed them to Moses.  The "story arc" is clear to Moses despite the millenia of history between Genesis and Leviticus.  The plan for ultimate restoration is hazy, but God is at work repairing some of the damage. Blessings, Jeff What is the prohibition on child sacrifice doing in the list of prohibited sexual relations? Be fruitful and multiply - First commandment in Genesis.  God made the world to be inhabited.   Having children is how this  was to happen.  So child sacrifice was a direct violation of this first command to Adam and Eve. Marriage is one man and one woman is the creation order. Seems simple enough.  I can imagine men thinking, Yeah but God didn't say which woman.  I will do the one woman thing if she is my sister, or aunt or …..  So God gives all these examples of unlawful unions.  To this day, man stil

1 Chronicles 24:1-6 How about those Levites! Day 332

Good morning friends, Good foundations are important.  Our author turns to the religious life of the returning exiles. Blessings, Jeff We have seen the emphasis on the Davidic line in the  political life of Israel.  The other area of emphasis is the Aaronic priesthood and Levitical workers. In this passage we have a quick review of the somewhat sanitized picture of the start of Aaron's line.  The returning exiles would have known that Nadab and Abihu did not just "die before their father without children".  They rebelled against God by offering unauthorized fire and were themselves consumed by fire from the Lord. Leviticus 10.  The case of Abiathar  son of Ahitub son of Ahimelech, who was faithful to David, but later rebelled with Adonijah is also not mentioned. But the passage points to the importance of the Aaronic line to the rebuilding of the temple by the exiles.  The history of the northern kingdom which was without the Levites from the beginning could not be repeat

Matthew 22:23 - the danger of not knowing Scripture - Day 193

Yesterday's passage was not very theological.  Today's is very theological.  I have only scratched the surface, but hope this encourages us to question ourselves about "knowledge of Scripture and the power of God". Blessings  Jeff This is a fascinating dialogue between Sadducees and Jesus.  So let's interrogate the passage. What distinguishes the Sadducees from other Jewish doctrinal positions?  They deny that there is a resurrection.  They are absolutely committed to this doctrine. How does their commitment shape their thought and questions? Even though they don't believe in the resurrection, they formulate a question focused on showing the absurdity of the resurrection.  They are not pointing to a passage of scripture that supports them, but asking a hypothetical question to make resurrection look silly. What is the purpose of the "Levirate marriage"? Deuteronomy 5:5-8.  First this is not a violation of the 7th commandment (adultery).  Brothers wer