This was not in original postings although I had written it back on 11/4/20. So it is out of sequence on this list. Sorry.
Elihu concludes that Job opens his mouth in empty talk and multiplies his words without knowledge. While it is true that Job does not know the "have you considered my servant Job" story, Elihu does not know it either. For one creature to condemn another creature for lack of knowledge does seem to be harsh. This is an "ad hominem" attack. Elihu dismisses all Job has to say as "empty talk" because he lacks knowledge. Does Elihu take time to understand Job's perspective?
In the same way, I cannot dismiss all that Elihu says because he is off base at this point. I must hold fast the trustworthy word as taught, not my opinions based on man centered political or social thought.
Instruction - what does God expect of me? Discuss issues and ideas, not the person who holds a different position. For example, there is a reason people think that abortion is a good solution. Am I willing to actively listen so that I could state what they believe? I don't have to agree or be persuaded, but at least may be challenged to listen to my position.
Thanksgiving - You are the only one who is omniscient. Your truth is source of sound doctrine, not my human wisdom.
Confession - holding Elihu's position - that my opponent is without knowledge. While the mind of unbeliever is blinded to the glory of the gospel, it is not my logic that will open his eyes. I quench the Spirit when I try to assume His role in salvation.
Petition - listen and understand the voice that has had a different experience of the American experiment.
Comments
Post a Comment