Here is my catch up post. Jonathan has pointed out that one of the proofs of authenticity is inclusion of unnecessary details. Today we have an example.
Blessings,
Jeff
Why would anybody makeup a story like this? Especially since it was so easy to disprove. If any one claim was false, the whole argument would fall apart. All the Jews had to do to silence Paul and put an end to Christianity was produce a witness to refute just one of his claims. Killing him is only reasonable if his claims are actually true. Open statement of facts only works if the facts are true.
Why do we seek additional proof? Use of personal testimony of what Jesus has done for me or others for example. Why is subjective unverifiable information used instead of objective unrefuted evidence?
Thanksgiving - a rational logical personal God creates a rational logical cosmos.
Comments
Post a Comment