Skip to main content

Psalms 10:2-4 Thoughts on justice

Good evening fellow sojourners,

Hope you had a blessed Sabbath.  I am a day behind on devotional, but I think the Spirit was working on my thoughts for the last day.

May God give you his peace in the week ahead.

Blessings 

Jeff 

The concept of justice has been the subject of much debate in the last 6 months since the homicide of George Floyd.  Yesterday at Men's D, we read the following from the McArthur study guide on Proverbs. " Justice is the ability to conform to the will and standard of God - a practical righteousness that matches one's positional righteousness"  I took exception to this statement because it sounded like sinless perfection in this life.  But as a I started thinking about this passage from Psalms, I began to question my questioning.

The psalmist is establishing a link between injustice (hotly pursuing the poor, devising schemes, greedy for gain) and atheism (denounces the Lord, does not seek him, says "there is no God").  Since the root of injustice is atheism, the root of justice must be the God of the Bible.  So, I must agree that justice is the ability to conform to the will and standard of God.  Only the Christian can be just, because only the Christian has the ability to conform to the will and standard of God.  To be clear, se get this ability by being regenerated by God and having the Holy Spirit dwelling in us.  There is nothing inherent in a person who becomes a Christian that gives him this ability.

And as far as sinless perfection being implied, I am reading too much into the words.  Paul explains this in Philippians.  Press on to make Jesus my own, because he has made me his own.  But not that I have already attained or am already perfect.  Positional righteousness is complete in Christ and my goal should be to make it more and more a reality in my personal life.  

So when we look at injustice in the Michael Floyd case, the "justice" that Black Lives Matter looks for is not conformance to the will and standard of God.  There may be some Christians involved, but the "justice" is coercive and focused on an artificial standard of man's making.  It is ultimately legalism.  Was taking George Floyd's life in conformance with God's will or standard.  Absolutely not.  But neither is the "justice" desired by BLM.

Instruction - God is just because he judges with complete knowledge of thoughts and intents of the heart.  He is not partial to any social or ethnic group.  As a believer, I must precise define what justice is and not allow culture to co-opt the word.

Thanksgiving - Only the God revealed in scripture is just.  By accepting Jesus' payment on the cross, The Father  is just in forgiving sins of believers.  He doesn't pretend the sins never happened.  They are swallowed up in the righteousness of Christ.

Confession - my mind is not renewed in all areas.  Language is surrendered to cultural forces that scheme and plot to murder the innocent.

Petition - make us bold to proclaim the truth of the gospel.  Only conversion will bring true justice to society.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Leviticus 18:21 - Partial restoration of creation order

Dear Friends, Some times we forget that Moses wrote Genesis.  Obviously, he did not have first hand knowledge of the events of creation.  But God did and revealed them to Moses.  The "story arc" is clear to Moses despite the millenia of history between Genesis and Leviticus.  The plan for ultimate restoration is hazy, but God is at work repairing some of the damage. Blessings, Jeff What is the prohibition on child sacrifice doing in the list of prohibited sexual relations? Be fruitful and multiply - First commandment in Genesis.  God made the world to be inhabited.   Having children is how this  was to happen.  So child sacrifice was a direct violation of this first command to Adam and Eve. Marriage is one man and one woman is the creation order. Seems simple enough.  I can imagine men thinking, Yeah but God didn't say which woman.  I will do the one woman thing if she is my sister, or aunt or …..  So God gives all these examples of unlawful unions.  To this day, man stil

1 Chronicles 24:1-6 How about those Levites! Day 332

Good morning friends, Good foundations are important.  Our author turns to the religious life of the returning exiles. Blessings, Jeff We have seen the emphasis on the Davidic line in the  political life of Israel.  The other area of emphasis is the Aaronic priesthood and Levitical workers. In this passage we have a quick review of the somewhat sanitized picture of the start of Aaron's line.  The returning exiles would have known that Nadab and Abihu did not just "die before their father without children".  They rebelled against God by offering unauthorized fire and were themselves consumed by fire from the Lord. Leviticus 10.  The case of Abiathar  son of Ahitub son of Ahimelech, who was faithful to David, but later rebelled with Adonijah is also not mentioned. But the passage points to the importance of the Aaronic line to the rebuilding of the temple by the exiles.  The history of the northern kingdom which was without the Levites from the beginning could not be repeat

Revelation 22:3-5 Final and eternal restoration - Day 365

Dear saints in the Lord, Congratulations!  You made it.  We have been through much turmoil in the last year ('20-'21).  But God is faithful to His promises.  I trust that you have been blessed in your reading and have drawn closer to God.   Since we didn't get the blog up and running at the beginning of the challenge, I am going to go back and post entries to cover that first month or so.   Blessings, Jeff Nothing accursed in the city of God, the new Jerusalem.  The presence of sin will be gone.  I am working on memorizing Westminster Shorter Catechism and currently on question 82.  Is any man able perfectly to keep the commandments of God? No mere man since the fall is able in this life perfectly to keep the commandments of God but does daily break them in thought, word and deed. I think our passage today points to the truth of this question.  Do you notice how this answer is not exactly the same as the question. "Any man" becomes "no mere man since the fall