Good afternoon saints in Christ, First devotional in second pass through Mark. Commentaries point out that Jesus' use of "Son of Man" is mainly found in Mark and that this ties back to Daniel. We are so removed from the OT world view that this name does not mean as much to us as it did to the audience who heard him and then read the gospels. We have to have it explained to us. They knew what it meant. Blessings, Jeff The authority of the Son of Man to forgive sins is validated by power to heal. The scribes correctly equate divinity with forgiving sins. Jesus puts ability to heal as divine prerogative. Doesn't say the words but makes the logical connection. The OT cleansing from leprosy indicates a leper could be healed but doesn't make it divine power. Miracles were done through the agency of men in OT. But none of them claimed right to forgive sins. Jesus doesn't fit into a category. And that is the whole point. Miracle ...